A New Jersey jury made a big statement to healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson, returning a verdict for $3.35 million in compensatory and $7.8 million in punitive damages for plaintiff Linda Gross who allegedly serious harm as a result of a J&J vaginal mesh product. New Jersey is generally viewed as a difficult state in which to receive punitive damages, making this momentous award all the more important. Many see this case as representative of the serious harm suffered by thousands of people who had the problematic vaginal mesh installed.

The jury determined that J&J did not adequately warn her surgeon of the significant risks of the device, and misled her and other patients about risks.

Gross, a hospice nurse from South Dakota, had 18 unsuccessful surgeries after the failure of her Gynecare Prolift vaginal mesh implant, which is manufactured by J&J subsidiary Ethicon, according to the Washington Post.

The jury determined that J&J did not adequately warn her surgeon of the significant risks of the device, and misled her and other patients about risks.

Punitive damages are generally only awarded for a plaintiff if a jury decides that a defendant acted with willful and wanton disregard for the rights of the plaintiff. Therefore, the Atlantic City jury made a strong statement that they believed Johnson& Johnson had behaved “so egregious and reckless as to disregard the health and safety of women,” according to Gross’s attorney.

Mesh products are commonly surgically inserted into the vagina to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

These devices are allegedly prone to failure though, and the adverse physical effects due to the contraction of the mesh are varied, including vaginal shortening, bleeding, scarring, infection, erosion, perforation, tightening and significant pain. There are still around 1,800 lawsuits in New Jersey and about 2,200 others nationwide involving Ethicon’s Prolift device. Other mesh manufacturers, including American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corp., are also facing vaginal mesh suits.

Some believe that Johnson & Johnson’s strategy is to drag out the first handful of trials while waiting for the statute of limitations on claims to run. If the statute of limitations expires before an individual files suit against the company, they are usually barred from ever seeking compensation for their injuries. For this reason, while the significant punitive damage award in this case is exciting, it is extremely important for those with potential claims to contact an attorney as soon as possible to discuss their options.

Our initial consultation is always free.

We are willing to travel to meet our potential clients, so do not hesitate to contact us today.

Please contact us for a free consultation about your rights and compensation claims.

SPIVA LAW GROUP
Howard E. Spiva

Law Practice Limited to Catastrophic Injuries:

912.920.2000
48 W. Montgomery Crossroads, Suite 202,
Savannah, Georgia 31406
(800) 920-2076 (Georgia Only) or
(800) 644-2001 (National)
www.SpivaLaw.com

Please feel free to call on me if I may ever be of service to you or your loved ones.

Make it a Great day!

Howard Spiva